Category Archives: advice

The importance of vacations

Employees need work – life balance.  Vacation time-off is one key to maintaining this balance.  Having said this, over the years HR pros have met some employers who have no issue with paying vacation pay earned but discourage vacation time-off.  What these employers fail to understand is that employees need time away from work.

Each jurisdiction in Canada sets its own minimum vacation pay / vacation time-off entitlements.  As a previous post showed, minimum vacation entitlements vary across the country.  These entitlements are minimums and there is nothing in any set of regulations which prevents employers from being more generous.  In fact, HR pros often recommends employers be more generous and here is why…

Employee Attraction.  Not all employers can be pay leaders nor do we they think  they need to be.  For some workers, the right combination of pay and paid vacation time-off can make a lower-paying job more attractive than a slightly better-paying job elsewhere.

Employee Satisfaction.  The idea of an employee keeping work at work and home at home is antiquated.  Paid vacation time-off allows an employee to take care of their physical, family, and mental well-being.

Productivity.  Employees who do not take vacation time-off are missing out on the chance to refocus and even the most positive of employees are subject to burnout.   Fact is that employees who do not take time-off are less productive!

Health.  For a host of reasons, not all employers are prepared to offer paid sick time-off.  Provided the vacation request process is flexible enough employees can use paid time-off in lieu of paid sick time.  (It must be noted here that using paid vacation time in lieu of sick time can be a de-motivator.  For this approach to be seen as a positive by employees, the paid vacation time-off entitlement must be more than the minimum under law.  It must be clearly communicated that one of the reasons the company provides enhanced paid vacation time-off is for this reason.)

Non-work Related Issues.  It would be nice if employees could attend to all personal obligations outside of working hours.  While employers should encourage employees to minimize their time away from work to attend to personal items the fact is that this is not always possible.  Providing higher-than-legally-required paid vacation time-off allows an employee paid time off to take care of those things that matter to them.

Safety Results.  Accidents happen for any number of reasons but mainly because of employee distraction.  Employees can become distracted when they have outstanding and unresolved (personal or workplace) issues, when they are tired, when they are not focused, etc.  Paid vacation time-off provides employees with the time away from the workplace that they need to recharge and take care of their lives.

To all those employers who provide vacation pay but discourage vacation time-off, and to all those employers who say they cannot afford to provide more paid vacation time-off than the legal entitlement, HR pros challenges you to reconsider the benefits of paid time away from the workplace.

Happy Summer 2012!

Human Resources Planning

While many businesses prepare a formal business plan few have a written human resources management plan as part of their overall business strategy.  Just as failing to address potential threats in the marketplace can jeopardize the viability of a business, failing to anticipate employment trends and employees’ needs can also impact overall business success.  It is critical that the company take a strategic approach to HR rather than a wait-and-see approach.

A solid Human Resources plan will address critical human resources management functional areas including but not limited to:  Recruitment and Selection, Benefits, Payroll, Wages, Training and Development, Succession Planning. 

Remember, there is an inherent danger in management “guessing” what its workforce wants or needs.  Engaging employees in the planning is as much a part of the strategy as the actual plan itself!

Does your company need a vacation policy?

Summer is allegedly just around the corner and many people will soon be making vacation plans. Whether you planning a trip or have decided to take a “stay-cation” at home, research has shown that vacations have many health related benefits.

A study of 1500 women in Wisconsin found that women who took regular vacations were less likely to suffer from depression. Researchers at the State University of New York at Oswego followed 12,000 men aged 35 to 57 and observed a 30% decrease in risk of death from heart disease among men who took vacations every year. Studies have also shown that employees who take vacations are more productive when they return from vacation.

Vacations mean healthier and more productive employees so it is always surprising to find out that a lot of employers do not have a specific employee policy on vacations. When I ask employers if they have a policy, quite often the answer is: “whatever it says in the labour code”.   In my opinion, a “whatever” answer is indicative of employers who are too busy to think through the positive impact that vacations have on employees and the company.

The Labour Standards provides a minimum standard of entitlement but it does not tell employers how to award vacation time-off. Some of the considerations of a vacation policy may include: seniority of employees, impact on operations, and scheduling. Do you allow vacations days off to be carried forward or not? Do you cash out unused vacations and when do you pay-out vacation days taken? Are some people allowed more discretion in the timing of their vacations than others? If you have operations in several jurisdictions, which Labour Standards do you follow?

A written and communicated vacation policy clarifies the company’s rules. It ensures that employees are treated fairly. A vacation policy allows for the planning of continued operations. The result of a good policy can be found in healthier, more engaged, and more productive employees.

The next post will discuss vacation pay.

 

What has changed in OH&S in Nova Scotia

The 1992 Westray mine disaster, some might argue, was the originating catalyst 0f change in the safety realm  on both provincial and federal levels…

In 2005, once the coal dust had long settled, the Federal government
enacted Bill C-45.  Bill C-45 was a new punishment scheme to allow the Courts not simply to fine corporations, but also to impose jail sentences.  Since the
enactment of Bill C-45 Nova Scotia has continued to change its perspective on
occupational health and safety and the obligations of employers, supervisors
and employees.

In 2007, the Nova Scotia government enacted the Violence in the
Workplace Regulations.  From 0ur perspective nearly all employers have an obligation to protect their employees from violence under these Regulations.

On January 15, 2010 the Nova Scotia government imposed Administrative Penalties.  These Penalties are a fining system under the OHS Act whereby Administrative Officers can fine employers, supervisors and employees; up to $4000 for an employer, $2000 for a supervisor and $1000 for an employee.  More than 900 fines were levied in 2010 and more than 850 of these fines were levied against employers.

In 2010, the OHS Division of the Department of Labour and Workforce
Development hired more than 30 new OHS Officers to inspect and audit workplaces.

In April 2011, the Nova Scotia Government increased the maximum fine
under the OHS Act from $250,000 to $500,000; the largest fines in the Atlantic
Regions.

 

Why is safety important – a true story

OHS – It’s More Than Just Compliance

I remember one time conducting WHMIS training.  “Marvin” kept making cat calls, “don’t tell me you care about this Tanya”, “what a waste of time”, “the MSDS are 5 years old, no one cares”, etc.  I finally got to the point where I ejected Marvin from the training and asked him to meet me in my office when the training was over. 

Once Marvin was gone, “Donnie” stood up and said Marvin had been right, that the MSDS were more than 5 years old.  He offered to update them if I got him the time away from his regular job.  I promised to do so.

After the training, back in my office, I sat with Marvin.  I asked Marvin whether he hated me, or did he hate the company, because every time I did safety training he publicly crucified me.  And, here I learned perhaps one of the most important lessons of my career.

“Tanya, you don’t get it”, Martin said.    “Those MSDS are old, they’re out of date, what if we need them and they’re no longer accurate.  This is a job for you but that is my brother out there, my cousins, my uncle, hell even my father worked here.  This isn’t just a job for me, this is my family, my community.”  Wow! 

I learned that day that that the safety is more than just compliance.  If I want my employees to be happy they have to feel like I am taking care of their health and safety, today and tomorrow.  If I want my employees to be productive they must be happy.  And, they are only going to be happy if there health and safety needs are met. 

I also learned a second lesson that day.  While Donnie was helpful he is not going to make an issue of the problems.  It is the Marvins of this world that are going to make the issues, that are going to keep companies honest.  While I wouldn’t want a whole workforce of Marvins we all need Marvins in the workplace, we need to harness them and respect that they are not in fact “troublemakers” but are much needed honest brokers. 

Safety, it’s more than just compliance…

A personal anecdote by Tanya Sieliakus, VP Consulting Services, Human Resources Consultant.